Hamlet- Shakespeare
Act III, Scene 4: Return of the Ghost. But is it really? Unusual though
it seems, the appearance of the ghost in the first act seems to be real. It is
seen by multiple people on multiple occasions and all of them confirm his
presence with each other, even talking about what the ghost is wearing to make
sure they are all seeing the same thing. Furthermore, when Hamlet speaks to the
ghost, the ghost gives him a very specific story as to how he died. The claim
that Claudius was the murder was later substantiated by Claudius’ confession that
he had committed the crime of “a brother’s murder.” Even the method of murder
that is described by the ghost gains credibility, but isn't completely proven, in
Claudius’s reaction of abruptly standing up and leaving the play when it is
revealed that the murderer “poisons him in the garden.” The accuracy of the
ghost’s statements and acknowledgment by many of his existence lead to the
conclusion that the ghost did really appear.
However, his appearance in Act III is not as definite. For one thing,
unlike the ghost’s first few appearances, in Act III, the ghost only appears to
Hamlet. The ghost appeared multiple times to people other than Hamlet (Horatio,
Marcellus, Barnardo, etc.), so it seems unusual that all of a sudden only
Hamlet sees and hears him while Queen Gertrude sees nothing and worries that
Hamlet truly is crazy. This is not the only difference between the ghost of Act
I and the ghost of Act III. Their attitudes toward Hamlet also differ. When the
ghost of Act I speaks to Hamlet, he is filled with anger, his sole purpose in
appearing being to demand that Hamlet “revenge his foul and most unnatural
murder.” He has no consideration for his own son, telling him he would be a “fat
weed” is he didn't do as his father instructed. This harsh personality is
completely turned around in Act III when the ghost is described as “piteous.”
Given these difference, one begins to wonder if the ghost really appears or if
he is merely brought to life by Hamlet’s mind.
If the ghost really is Hamlet’s creation, then Hamlet’s discourse with
the ghost would be a conversation between Hamlet and his own subconscious. So
what is the purpose of this conversation? Considering the ghost’s main concern,
Queen Gertrude, it seems to be Hamlet’s attempt to free his mother from
judgment. Throughout the play, Hamlet judges everyone morally, especially his
mother. He calls her no more than a “beast” and accuses her of “[killing] a
king.” However, if the ghost is Hamlet’s own subconscious, he seems to be
battling himself. He’s torn between being the “scourge and minister” that “heaven”
has called his to be and being simply Hamlet, son of Gertrude. Unwilling to
condemn and hate his mother yet unwilling to abandon his morals, he depends on
his father’s ghost’s words, to “taint not thy mind, nor let thy soul contrive
against thy mother aught” to justify his wish to let his mother go. It is this
wish that manifests itself in the form of his father’s ghost in his mind to
relieve the stress of his inner struggle. So maybe Hamlet doesn't actually hate
as mother as much as he says he does.
No comments:
Post a Comment